have us call you right now.

EmpCo in the Netherlands: what the ACM expects from claims

Last updated:

9 minute read

9 minute read

Summary:

The EmpCo directive (Directive (EU) 2024/825, Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition) applies in the Netherlands from 27 September 2026. The Netherlands implemented it in Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code through the Implementation Act on better sustainability information for consumers (Stb. 2026, 152). Towards consumers, it bans among other things generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance, claims that a product is climate neutral or has a reduced impact because of carbon offsetting (art. 6:193g sub ae of the Dutch Civil Code), company labels without independent verification, and future performance claims without a public, verified plan. The Dutch consumer authority ACM supervises compliance and has asked companies to review their claims. Earlier cases involving Eneco, Vattenfall and KLM show how strictly claims were already assessed.

Summary:

The EmpCo directive (Directive (EU) 2024/825, Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition) applies in the Netherlands from 27 September 2026. The Netherlands implemented it in Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code through the Implementation Act on better sustainability information for consumers (Stb. 2026, 152). Towards consumers, it bans among other things generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance, claims that a product is climate neutral or has a reduced impact because of carbon offsetting (art. 6:193g sub ae of the Dutch Civil Code), company labels without independent verification, and future performance claims without a public, verified plan. The Dutch consumer authority ACM supervises compliance and has asked companies to review their claims. Earlier cases involving Eneco, Vattenfall and KLM show how strictly claims were already assessed.

Summary:

The EmpCo directive (Directive (EU) 2024/825, Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition) applies in the Netherlands from 27 September 2026. The Netherlands implemented it in Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code through the Implementation Act on better sustainability information for consumers (Stb. 2026, 152). Towards consumers, it bans among other things generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance, claims that a product is climate neutral or has a reduced impact because of carbon offsetting (art. 6:193g sub ae of the Dutch Civil Code), company labels without independent verification, and future performance claims without a public, verified plan. The Dutch consumer authority ACM supervises compliance and has asked companies to review their claims. Earlier cases involving Eneco, Vattenfall and KLM show how strictly claims were already assessed.

For companies in the Netherlands, EmpCo mainly confirms a line that was already there. The ACM warned for years against vague terms such as “climate neutral” and “CO2 neutral”, the Dutch Advertising Code Committee rejected claims about carbon offsetting, and a court ruled that KLM misled consumers. Since 27 September 2026, part of that line is written into law.

This article explains how EmpCo is implemented in the Netherlands, what is banned, what the ACM expects, what earlier Dutch cases show and what to do with the claims you have. It is relevant for any company that sells to Dutch consumers, also from abroad.

The short answer. EmpCo applies in the Netherlands since 27 September 2026 through Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code. Carbon neutral claims about products based on carbon credits are banned, generic climate claims about your company are only allowed with recognised excellent performance, company labels without independent verification are no longer allowed, and ambitions must be concrete and verifiable. The ACM enforces the rules, and competitors and campaign groups can go to the Advertising Code Committee or to court.

How EmpCo is implemented in the Netherlands

EmpCo is an EU directive that amends the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. The Netherlands implemented it with the Implementation Act on better sustainability information for consumers (Stb. 2026, 152), which amends Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code. The act entered into force in July 2026; the new rules apply from 27 September 2026, the date set by the directive.

The offsetting ban is in art. 6:193g sub ae of the Dutch Civil Code: it is always misleading to claim “that a product, thanks to the compensation of greenhouse gas emissions, has a neutral, reduced or positive environmental effect in terms of greenhouse gas emissions”. The ACM is the supervisor. In its publication of 24 September 2026 (in Dutch), it calls on companies to review their current sustainability claims critically and take steps where needed.

Free tool

Do your claims meet the new Dutch rules?

Test your climate claims against EmpCo, which applies in the Netherlands from 27 September 2026 and is enforced by the ACM.

Check your claim

Free · no account needed

Regreener free tools for carbon credit buyers

What is banned towards consumers

Claim or practice

Rule

“Climate neutral”, “CO2 neutral” or “CO2 compensated” product because of credits

Always banned (art. 6:193g sub ae, Annex I point 4c)

Generic environmental claims such as “green”, “eco-friendly”, “climate neutral company”

Only allowed with recognised excellent environmental performance

Own company label without independent verification

No longer allowed; labels must be based on a certification scheme or set by public authorities

Claim about the whole product when it concerns one aspect

Banned

Future claim such as “net zero by 2040”

Only with a detailed, realistic and public implementation plan that is independently verified

EmpCo also covers information on durability, reparability and software updates, but for companies that buy carbon credits, the claim rules matter most. What you can still say is a contribution claim: which verified climate projects you finance, without claiming that your emissions are cancelled. Our guide to carbon neutral claims under EmpCo goes through the rules claim by claim.

What earlier Dutch cases show

The ACM, the Advertising Code Committee and the courts were already critical of climate claims before EmpCo. Four examples:

  • Eneco, May 2024. After action by the ACM, Eneco stopped using the slogan “Sneller klimaatneutraal” (faster climate neutral) in consumer advertising. The ACM called it a pitfall to use general, vague terms such as climate neutral, CO2 neutral or sustainable (ACM, in Dutch).

  • Vattenfall, July 2024. Vattenfall stopped using “Fossielvrij leven binnen één generatie” (fossil-free living within one generation). The ACM wants ambitions to be concrete and measurable, for example “40% less CO2 emissions in 2030 compared to 2023” (ACM, in Dutch).

  • KLM, March 2024. In a collective action brought by the foundation Fossielvrij, the Amsterdam District Court ruled that a number of KLM’s advertising statements were misleading and unlawful (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:1512). In April 2022 the Advertising Code Committee had already rejected the claim “CO2ZERO”.

  • “CO2-compensated gas”, December 2025. The Advertising Code Committee ruled that Eneco and Energie VanOns sold consumers “CO2-compensated gas” without properly substantiating the claim. One of the points: the credits came from wind farms that had been running for a long time.

The pattern is clear: vague neutrality claims and claims based on offsetting do not hold, and the quality of the credits is part of the assessment. With EmpCo, part of this is now a fixed ban instead of a case-by-case test.

Free tool

Check a claim before the ACM does

The EmpCo Claim Checker flags claims that rely on offsetting and suggests wording that fits the new rules.

Check your claim

Free · no account needed

Regreener free tools for carbon credit buyers

The ACM’s five rules of thumb, applied to carbon credit claims

The ACM’s guidelines on sustainability claims (second version, June 2023) set out five rules of thumb. Applied to companies that buy carbon credits:

  1. Use correct, clear, specific and complete sustainability claims. Say what you finance, how much and under which standard.

  2. Substantiate your sustainability claims with facts and keep them up to date. Keep registry retirement evidence, project details and volumes at hand, and update them every year.

  3. Make fair comparisons with other products or competitors. Do not compare a product with credits to one without as if the first were cleaner.

  4. Describe future sustainability ambitions concretely and measurably. “40% less emissions in 2030 compared to 2023”, with a public plan, rather than “on the way to climate neutral”.

  5. Make sure visual claims and labels help consumers and do not confuse them. No home-made “climate neutral” logo; no leaves or green ticks next to offsetting text.

B2B, old stock and enforcement

B2B. EmpCo covers communication towards consumers. Claims that only reach business customers fall under the rules on misleading advertising (art. 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code). A public website, a LinkedIn post or a press release can reach consumers; treat those as consumer communication.

Old stock. Packaging printed before 27 September 2026 gets no automatic exemption. According to the ACM’s note on old stock (in Dutch), authorities may take demonstrable old stock into account when enforcing, but expect companies to work towards full compliance in good time.

Enforcement. The ACM supervises the consumer rules. Consumers, competitors and campaign groups can also complain to the Advertising Code Committee or go to court, as in the KLM case.

What to do now

  1. List your claims. Website, packaging, proposals, annual report, email signatures, LinkedIn.

  2. Remove offsetting claims about products. “CO2 neutral”, “climate neutral” or “CO2 compensated” based on credits is no longer allowed towards consumers.

  3. Rewrite them as contribution claims. What you financed, how much, which standard, and that it does not reduce your own emissions. Our guide to contribution claims gives wording per channel.

  4. Check your labels. Company labels without independent verification have to go.

  5. Make ambitions concrete. A number, a year, a base year and a public plan.

  6. Record the evidence. Registry retirements in your company’s name, project details and a public page.

Tip from Bernard de Wit, Co-founder of Regreener: “Anyone who followed the Dutch rulings of the past few years could see this coming. In the compensated-gas case, the Advertising Code Committee looked at the credits as well as the words: wind farms that had been running for years. Good wording does not rescue a weak credit. Start with the quality of what you buy, and write the claim after that.”

That is why Regreener assesses every project against our 100+ datapoint quality framework before we offer it. And for the background on why the Green Claims Directive stalled while EmpCo went ahead, see the EU Green Claims Directive: status in 2026.

Test your claims

Regreener’s free EmpCo Claim Checker tests claims about carbon credits against the rules that apply now: answer three questions per claim and get the outcome, the legal source and wording you can use instead. Test your climate claims against EmpCo, or talk to a Climate Strategist about the credits behind your claims.

For companies in the Netherlands, EmpCo mainly confirms a line that was already there. The ACM warned for years against vague terms such as “climate neutral” and “CO2 neutral”, the Dutch Advertising Code Committee rejected claims about carbon offsetting, and a court ruled that KLM misled consumers. Since 27 September 2026, part of that line is written into law.

This article explains how EmpCo is implemented in the Netherlands, what is banned, what the ACM expects, what earlier Dutch cases show and what to do with the claims you have. It is relevant for any company that sells to Dutch consumers, also from abroad.

The short answer. EmpCo applies in the Netherlands since 27 September 2026 through Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code. Carbon neutral claims about products based on carbon credits are banned, generic climate claims about your company are only allowed with recognised excellent performance, company labels without independent verification are no longer allowed, and ambitions must be concrete and verifiable. The ACM enforces the rules, and competitors and campaign groups can go to the Advertising Code Committee or to court.

How EmpCo is implemented in the Netherlands

EmpCo is an EU directive that amends the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. The Netherlands implemented it with the Implementation Act on better sustainability information for consumers (Stb. 2026, 152), which amends Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code. The act entered into force in July 2026; the new rules apply from 27 September 2026, the date set by the directive.

The offsetting ban is in art. 6:193g sub ae of the Dutch Civil Code: it is always misleading to claim “that a product, thanks to the compensation of greenhouse gas emissions, has a neutral, reduced or positive environmental effect in terms of greenhouse gas emissions”. The ACM is the supervisor. In its publication of 24 September 2026 (in Dutch), it calls on companies to review their current sustainability claims critically and take steps where needed.

Free tool

Do your claims meet the new Dutch rules?

Test your climate claims against EmpCo, which applies in the Netherlands from 27 September 2026 and is enforced by the ACM.

Check your claim

Free · no account needed

Regreener free tools for carbon credit buyers

What is banned towards consumers

Claim or practice

Rule

“Climate neutral”, “CO2 neutral” or “CO2 compensated” product because of credits

Always banned (art. 6:193g sub ae, Annex I point 4c)

Generic environmental claims such as “green”, “eco-friendly”, “climate neutral company”

Only allowed with recognised excellent environmental performance

Own company label without independent verification

No longer allowed; labels must be based on a certification scheme or set by public authorities

Claim about the whole product when it concerns one aspect

Banned

Future claim such as “net zero by 2040”

Only with a detailed, realistic and public implementation plan that is independently verified

EmpCo also covers information on durability, reparability and software updates, but for companies that buy carbon credits, the claim rules matter most. What you can still say is a contribution claim: which verified climate projects you finance, without claiming that your emissions are cancelled. Our guide to carbon neutral claims under EmpCo goes through the rules claim by claim.

What earlier Dutch cases show

The ACM, the Advertising Code Committee and the courts were already critical of climate claims before EmpCo. Four examples:

  • Eneco, May 2024. After action by the ACM, Eneco stopped using the slogan “Sneller klimaatneutraal” (faster climate neutral) in consumer advertising. The ACM called it a pitfall to use general, vague terms such as climate neutral, CO2 neutral or sustainable (ACM, in Dutch).

  • Vattenfall, July 2024. Vattenfall stopped using “Fossielvrij leven binnen één generatie” (fossil-free living within one generation). The ACM wants ambitions to be concrete and measurable, for example “40% less CO2 emissions in 2030 compared to 2023” (ACM, in Dutch).

  • KLM, March 2024. In a collective action brought by the foundation Fossielvrij, the Amsterdam District Court ruled that a number of KLM’s advertising statements were misleading and unlawful (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:1512). In April 2022 the Advertising Code Committee had already rejected the claim “CO2ZERO”.

  • “CO2-compensated gas”, December 2025. The Advertising Code Committee ruled that Eneco and Energie VanOns sold consumers “CO2-compensated gas” without properly substantiating the claim. One of the points: the credits came from wind farms that had been running for a long time.

The pattern is clear: vague neutrality claims and claims based on offsetting do not hold, and the quality of the credits is part of the assessment. With EmpCo, part of this is now a fixed ban instead of a case-by-case test.

Free tool

Check a claim before the ACM does

The EmpCo Claim Checker flags claims that rely on offsetting and suggests wording that fits the new rules.

Check your claim

Free · no account needed

Regreener free tools for carbon credit buyers

The ACM’s five rules of thumb, applied to carbon credit claims

The ACM’s guidelines on sustainability claims (second version, June 2023) set out five rules of thumb. Applied to companies that buy carbon credits:

  1. Use correct, clear, specific and complete sustainability claims. Say what you finance, how much and under which standard.

  2. Substantiate your sustainability claims with facts and keep them up to date. Keep registry retirement evidence, project details and volumes at hand, and update them every year.

  3. Make fair comparisons with other products or competitors. Do not compare a product with credits to one without as if the first were cleaner.

  4. Describe future sustainability ambitions concretely and measurably. “40% less emissions in 2030 compared to 2023”, with a public plan, rather than “on the way to climate neutral”.

  5. Make sure visual claims and labels help consumers and do not confuse them. No home-made “climate neutral” logo; no leaves or green ticks next to offsetting text.

B2B, old stock and enforcement

B2B. EmpCo covers communication towards consumers. Claims that only reach business customers fall under the rules on misleading advertising (art. 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code). A public website, a LinkedIn post or a press release can reach consumers; treat those as consumer communication.

Old stock. Packaging printed before 27 September 2026 gets no automatic exemption. According to the ACM’s note on old stock (in Dutch), authorities may take demonstrable old stock into account when enforcing, but expect companies to work towards full compliance in good time.

Enforcement. The ACM supervises the consumer rules. Consumers, competitors and campaign groups can also complain to the Advertising Code Committee or go to court, as in the KLM case.

What to do now

  1. List your claims. Website, packaging, proposals, annual report, email signatures, LinkedIn.

  2. Remove offsetting claims about products. “CO2 neutral”, “climate neutral” or “CO2 compensated” based on credits is no longer allowed towards consumers.

  3. Rewrite them as contribution claims. What you financed, how much, which standard, and that it does not reduce your own emissions. Our guide to contribution claims gives wording per channel.

  4. Check your labels. Company labels without independent verification have to go.

  5. Make ambitions concrete. A number, a year, a base year and a public plan.

  6. Record the evidence. Registry retirements in your company’s name, project details and a public page.

Tip from Bernard de Wit, Co-founder of Regreener: “Anyone who followed the Dutch rulings of the past few years could see this coming. In the compensated-gas case, the Advertising Code Committee looked at the credits as well as the words: wind farms that had been running for years. Good wording does not rescue a weak credit. Start with the quality of what you buy, and write the claim after that.”

That is why Regreener assesses every project against our 100+ datapoint quality framework before we offer it. And for the background on why the Green Claims Directive stalled while EmpCo went ahead, see the EU Green Claims Directive: status in 2026.

Test your claims

Regreener’s free EmpCo Claim Checker tests claims about carbon credits against the rules that apply now: answer three questions per claim and get the outcome, the legal source and wording you can use instead. Test your climate claims against EmpCo, or talk to a Climate Strategist about the credits behind your claims.

For companies in the Netherlands, EmpCo mainly confirms a line that was already there. The ACM warned for years against vague terms such as “climate neutral” and “CO2 neutral”, the Dutch Advertising Code Committee rejected claims about carbon offsetting, and a court ruled that KLM misled consumers. Since 27 September 2026, part of that line is written into law.

This article explains how EmpCo is implemented in the Netherlands, what is banned, what the ACM expects, what earlier Dutch cases show and what to do with the claims you have. It is relevant for any company that sells to Dutch consumers, also from abroad.

The short answer. EmpCo applies in the Netherlands since 27 September 2026 through Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code. Carbon neutral claims about products based on carbon credits are banned, generic climate claims about your company are only allowed with recognised excellent performance, company labels without independent verification are no longer allowed, and ambitions must be concrete and verifiable. The ACM enforces the rules, and competitors and campaign groups can go to the Advertising Code Committee or to court.

How EmpCo is implemented in the Netherlands

EmpCo is an EU directive that amends the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. The Netherlands implemented it with the Implementation Act on better sustainability information for consumers (Stb. 2026, 152), which amends Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code. The act entered into force in July 2026; the new rules apply from 27 September 2026, the date set by the directive.

The offsetting ban is in art. 6:193g sub ae of the Dutch Civil Code: it is always misleading to claim “that a product, thanks to the compensation of greenhouse gas emissions, has a neutral, reduced or positive environmental effect in terms of greenhouse gas emissions”. The ACM is the supervisor. In its publication of 24 September 2026 (in Dutch), it calls on companies to review their current sustainability claims critically and take steps where needed.

Free tool

Do your claims meet the new Dutch rules?

Test your climate claims against EmpCo, which applies in the Netherlands from 27 September 2026 and is enforced by the ACM.

Check your claim

Free · no account needed

Regreener free tools for carbon credit buyers

What is banned towards consumers

Claim or practice

Rule

“Climate neutral”, “CO2 neutral” or “CO2 compensated” product because of credits

Always banned (art. 6:193g sub ae, Annex I point 4c)

Generic environmental claims such as “green”, “eco-friendly”, “climate neutral company”

Only allowed with recognised excellent environmental performance

Own company label without independent verification

No longer allowed; labels must be based on a certification scheme or set by public authorities

Claim about the whole product when it concerns one aspect

Banned

Future claim such as “net zero by 2040”

Only with a detailed, realistic and public implementation plan that is independently verified

EmpCo also covers information on durability, reparability and software updates, but for companies that buy carbon credits, the claim rules matter most. What you can still say is a contribution claim: which verified climate projects you finance, without claiming that your emissions are cancelled. Our guide to carbon neutral claims under EmpCo goes through the rules claim by claim.

What earlier Dutch cases show

The ACM, the Advertising Code Committee and the courts were already critical of climate claims before EmpCo. Four examples:

  • Eneco, May 2024. After action by the ACM, Eneco stopped using the slogan “Sneller klimaatneutraal” (faster climate neutral) in consumer advertising. The ACM called it a pitfall to use general, vague terms such as climate neutral, CO2 neutral or sustainable (ACM, in Dutch).

  • Vattenfall, July 2024. Vattenfall stopped using “Fossielvrij leven binnen één generatie” (fossil-free living within one generation). The ACM wants ambitions to be concrete and measurable, for example “40% less CO2 emissions in 2030 compared to 2023” (ACM, in Dutch).

  • KLM, March 2024. In a collective action brought by the foundation Fossielvrij, the Amsterdam District Court ruled that a number of KLM’s advertising statements were misleading and unlawful (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:1512). In April 2022 the Advertising Code Committee had already rejected the claim “CO2ZERO”.

  • “CO2-compensated gas”, December 2025. The Advertising Code Committee ruled that Eneco and Energie VanOns sold consumers “CO2-compensated gas” without properly substantiating the claim. One of the points: the credits came from wind farms that had been running for a long time.

The pattern is clear: vague neutrality claims and claims based on offsetting do not hold, and the quality of the credits is part of the assessment. With EmpCo, part of this is now a fixed ban instead of a case-by-case test.

Free tool

Check a claim before the ACM does

The EmpCo Claim Checker flags claims that rely on offsetting and suggests wording that fits the new rules.

Check your claim

Free · no account needed

Regreener free tools for carbon credit buyers

The ACM’s five rules of thumb, applied to carbon credit claims

The ACM’s guidelines on sustainability claims (second version, June 2023) set out five rules of thumb. Applied to companies that buy carbon credits:

  1. Use correct, clear, specific and complete sustainability claims. Say what you finance, how much and under which standard.

  2. Substantiate your sustainability claims with facts and keep them up to date. Keep registry retirement evidence, project details and volumes at hand, and update them every year.

  3. Make fair comparisons with other products or competitors. Do not compare a product with credits to one without as if the first were cleaner.

  4. Describe future sustainability ambitions concretely and measurably. “40% less emissions in 2030 compared to 2023”, with a public plan, rather than “on the way to climate neutral”.

  5. Make sure visual claims and labels help consumers and do not confuse them. No home-made “climate neutral” logo; no leaves or green ticks next to offsetting text.

B2B, old stock and enforcement

B2B. EmpCo covers communication towards consumers. Claims that only reach business customers fall under the rules on misleading advertising (art. 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code). A public website, a LinkedIn post or a press release can reach consumers; treat those as consumer communication.

Old stock. Packaging printed before 27 September 2026 gets no automatic exemption. According to the ACM’s note on old stock (in Dutch), authorities may take demonstrable old stock into account when enforcing, but expect companies to work towards full compliance in good time.

Enforcement. The ACM supervises the consumer rules. Consumers, competitors and campaign groups can also complain to the Advertising Code Committee or go to court, as in the KLM case.

What to do now

  1. List your claims. Website, packaging, proposals, annual report, email signatures, LinkedIn.

  2. Remove offsetting claims about products. “CO2 neutral”, “climate neutral” or “CO2 compensated” based on credits is no longer allowed towards consumers.

  3. Rewrite them as contribution claims. What you financed, how much, which standard, and that it does not reduce your own emissions. Our guide to contribution claims gives wording per channel.

  4. Check your labels. Company labels without independent verification have to go.

  5. Make ambitions concrete. A number, a year, a base year and a public plan.

  6. Record the evidence. Registry retirements in your company’s name, project details and a public page.

Tip from Bernard de Wit, Co-founder of Regreener: “Anyone who followed the Dutch rulings of the past few years could see this coming. In the compensated-gas case, the Advertising Code Committee looked at the credits as well as the words: wind farms that had been running for years. Good wording does not rescue a weak credit. Start with the quality of what you buy, and write the claim after that.”

That is why Regreener assesses every project against our 100+ datapoint quality framework before we offer it. And for the background on why the Green Claims Directive stalled while EmpCo went ahead, see the EU Green Claims Directive: status in 2026.

Test your claims

Regreener’s free EmpCo Claim Checker tests claims about carbon credits against the rules that apply now: answer three questions per claim and get the outcome, the legal source and wording you can use instead. Test your climate claims against EmpCo, or talk to a Climate Strategist about the credits behind your claims.

Free tool

Test your climate claims against EmpCo

Check what you say about your carbon credits and get, per claim, the outcome, the legal source and wording you can use instead.

Check your claim

Free · no account needed

Regreener free tools for carbon credit buyers

About the Author

bernard de wit of regreener

Bernard de Wit

Bernard is the Founder of Regreener, starting in 2020 after studying Law in Leiden (the Netherlands) and Oxford (United Kingdom). Passionate about climate action and carbon credit markets, he helps companies take trustworthy, impactful climate action by sharing insights and best practices. Since 2020, he has assessed hundreds carbon projects against Regreener's 100+ datapoint quality framework. He writes regularly on voluntary carbon market integrity, Article 6 mechanisms, and the SBTi Net-Zero Standard v2.0. When he’s not writing or advising businesses on their sustainability goals, you might find Bernard on the tennis court or catching up with friends.

Free tools

Six free tools for carbon credit buyers

Plan your budget, check your SBTi V2 requirements, build an RFP, compare quotes and check credit quality.

Regreener free tools for carbon credit buyers

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Share Article

Share Article

FAQs

When does the EmpCo directive apply in the Netherlands?

The new rules apply from 27 September 2026. The Netherlands implemented the directive in Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code through the Implementation Act on better sustainability information for consumers (Stb. 2026, 152).

Can I still call my product CO2 neutral in the Netherlands?

Not if the claim is based on carbon offsetting. Art. 6:193g sub ae of the Dutch Civil Code bans claims towards consumers that a product has a neutral, reduced or positive greenhouse gas impact because of offsetting.

What does the ACM do about misleading climate claims?

The ACM supervises the consumer rules, addresses companies and can enforce. In 2024, Eneco and Vattenfall dropped vague climate claims after ACM action. Complaints can also go to the Advertising Code Committee and cases to court.

Does EmpCo apply to B2B communication in the Netherlands?

EmpCo's bans apply to communication aimed at consumers. Claims that only reach business customers fall under the rules on misleading advertising (art. 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code). A public website can reach consumers and then counts.

What can I still say about my carbon credits?

A contribution claim: which verified climate projects you finance, how much, under which standard, and that it does not reduce your own emissions, with retirement evidence on a public page.

Greenwashing-proof carbon removal

Portrait of a climate strategist
Portrait of a climate strategist

Get a free consultation with Regreener's carbon removal experts